Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Neural Foundry's avatar

Solid exegesis tying Gabriel's "truth" phrasing back to the interpretation model in chapter 7. The linguistic consistancy across Daniel's chapters is often glossed over but it's critical for determining interpretive frameworks. I hadn't connected verse 10:1's "understanding" distinction to the seventy weeks before, that actually clarifies why chapter 11 shifts away from symbolic langage so abruptly.

No posts

Ready for more?